🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing group of states are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to approve a bill lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended parents to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for minors without parental consent is given. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," stated the MEP supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to follow this example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Outside of these regions, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and others show that states globally are less and less prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.